DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV451118·santaclara·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayDENIED

So Yeon Chun v. Hyeon Eui Lee

Motion to deem admitted requests for admission

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

Cross-ComplainantHyeon Eui Lee
Cross-DefendantDong Suk Yoo

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 18, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 5 24CV451118 So Yeon Chun v. Hyeon Cross-complainant Hyeon Eui Lee’s motion to deem admitted Eui Lee requests for admission, set one, against self-represented cross- defendant Dong Suk Yoo. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.) Notice is not proper. The proof of service was served by electronic service. But Dong Suk Yoo did not expressly consent to receive electronic service. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6, subd. (c) [service on unrepresented persons].) Though it does not appear the moving papers were sent by U.S.

Mail, the court also observes that cross-complainant appears to have the wrong physical address for Dong Suk Yoo. The proof of service indicates a mailing address of 34560 El Camino Real, but the party’s address of record is 3450 El Camino Real. The motion is DENIED. The court will prepare the order. Line 6 25CV474284 Richard Ortiz v. General Click LINE 6 or scroll down for ruling. Motors, LLC Line 7 25CV474284 Richard Ortiz v. General Click LINE 6 or scroll down for ruling. Motors, LLC Line 8 26CV497313 EV Core Corp. dba Club Click LINE 8 or scroll down for ruling.

Pilates Evergreen Valley, a California corporation v. JM Home Builders, Inc., a California corporation

- oo0oo -

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share