Reed v. California Highway Patrol
Defendant’s Demurrer to the Complaint
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
(48) Tentative Ruling
Re: Reed v. California Highway Patrol Superior Court Case No. 25CECG04900
Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 (Dept. 503)
Motion: Defendant’s Demurrer to the Complaint
Tentative Ruling:
To sustain defendant California Highway Patrol’s demurrer to the Complaint, without leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e).) The prevailing party is directed to submit to this court, within seven days of service of the minute order, a proposed judgment dismissing the action as to the demurring defendant.
Explanation:
Government Code section 815 provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by statute...[a] public entity is not liable for an injury, whether such injury arises out of an act or omission of the public entity or a public employee or any other person.” In other words, “all government tort liability must be based on statute.” (County of San Bernardino v. Superior Court (2022) 77 Cal.App.5th 1100, 1107 [emphasis added]; Gov. Code, § 810, et seq.) “[I]n the absence of some constitutional requirement, public entities may be liable only if a statute declares them to be liable.” (Id. at p. 1108 [emphasis in original].)
Defendant State of California, by and through the California Highway Patrol (“Defendant”) demurs on the basis that the sole cause of action plead in Plaintiff’s complaint is barred by the Government Claims Act. Plaintiff’s Complaint contains a single cause of action for general negligence against Defendant. Government Code section 815 bars common law tort liability for public entities. (Miklosy v. Regents of University of California (2008) 44 Cal.4th 876, 899.) Thus, Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state a cause of action against Defendant. An opposition was not filed in response. As such, the demurrer is sustained, without leave to amend.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: JS on 8/14/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
9
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”