DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CECG02733·fresno·Probate·Contract
Hearing todayGRANTED

Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. E & S Farming, LLC et al.

Motion by Plaintiff to Enforce Settlement

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
503
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$330,989.41$301,863.90$60.00$930.00$302,583.90$990.00

Parties

PlaintiffHelena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
DefendantE & S Farming, LLC et al.

Ruling

(35) Tentative Ruling

Re: Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. E & S Farming, LLC et al. Superior Court Case No. 25CECG02733

Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 (Dept. 503)

Motion: By Plaintiff to Enforce Settlement

Tentative Ruling:

To grant. To approve fees and costs in the combined amount of $990.00 as sought. To sign the proposed judgment lodged on June 29, 2026.

Explanation:

Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 provides as follows: “If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court . . . for settlement of the case . . . the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.” It also provides that the parties may request that the court “retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6.) Due to the summary nature of the statute authorizing judgment to enforce a settlement agreement, strict compliance with its requirements is prerequisite to invoking the power of the court to impose a settlement agreement. (J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 974, 984.)

Here, plaintiff Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC (“Plaintiff”) submits a writing, signed by the parties, made outside the presence of the court. Further, the writing reflects that this court would retain jurisdiction under section 664.6 to enforce the writing. (Luzania Decl., ¶ 4, and Ex. A thereto.) The agreement contemplated scheduled payments totaling $330,989.41 to settle the claims of this action. Plaintiff submits that defendant E & S Farming, LLC has made payments but has not complied with the terms of the settlement as of April 28, 2026. (Id., ¶¶ 4, 5.) Plaintiff seeks entry of judgment as to the outstanding balance of $301,863.90 as well as $60.00 in costs, and $930.00 in fees, a total of $302,583.90. No opposition was filed.

Based on the above, the court finds a valid written signed settlement agreement outside of the presence of the court, and judgment will be entered in accordance with the terms of the written settlement agreement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (a).)

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: JS on 8/17/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date) 10

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share