Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. E & S Farming, LLC et al.
Motion by Plaintiff to Enforce Settlement
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
(35) Tentative Ruling
Re: Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. E & S Farming, LLC et al. Superior Court Case No. 25CECG02733
Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 (Dept. 503)
Motion: By Plaintiff to Enforce Settlement
Tentative Ruling:
To grant. To approve fees and costs in the combined amount of $990.00 as sought. To sign the proposed judgment lodged on June 29, 2026.
Explanation:
Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 provides as follows: “If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court . . . for settlement of the case . . . the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.” It also provides that the parties may request that the court “retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6.) Due to the summary nature of the statute authorizing judgment to enforce a settlement agreement, strict compliance with its requirements is prerequisite to invoking the power of the court to impose a settlement agreement. (J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 974, 984.)
Here, plaintiff Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC (“Plaintiff”) submits a writing, signed by the parties, made outside the presence of the court. Further, the writing reflects that this court would retain jurisdiction under section 664.6 to enforce the writing. (Luzania Decl., ¶ 4, and Ex. A thereto.) The agreement contemplated scheduled payments totaling $330,989.41 to settle the claims of this action. Plaintiff submits that defendant E & S Farming, LLC has made payments but has not complied with the terms of the settlement as of April 28, 2026. (Id., ¶¶ 4, 5.) Plaintiff seeks entry of judgment as to the outstanding balance of $301,863.90 as well as $60.00 in costs, and $930.00 in fees, a total of $302,583.90. No opposition was filed.
Based on the above, the court finds a valid written signed settlement agreement outside of the presence of the court, and judgment will be entered in accordance with the terms of the written settlement agreement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (a).)
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: JS on 8/17/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date) 10
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”