DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR0215·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing in about 1 monthCONTINUED

ESTATE OF MARILYN MARIE POINSETT

Final Distribution Hearing

Hearing date
Sep 28, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMarilyn Marie Poinsett

Ruling

August 17, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

12. 25PR0215 ESTATE OF MARILYN MARIE POINSETT AKA MARILYN M. POINSETT AKA MARILYN POINSETT FINAL DISTRIBUTION HEARING

ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION DUE TO LACK OF JUDICIAL COVERAGE, THE COURT WILL HEAR THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT NINE. THERE WILL BE NO HEARING ON AUGUST 17, 2026. Letters of Administration were issued On October 6, 2025, granting Petitioner full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act.

A Final Inventory and Appraisal was filed on February 18, 2026. At the time the inventory and appraisal was filed, the change of ownership statement with the county recorder or assessor in each county where the decedent owned real property at the time of death, as provided in section 480 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, was filed.

Waivers of Account were executed by all of the heirs entitled to distributions under the estate.

Proof of Service of Notice of the hearing on the Petition was filed on July 8, 2026. No one has filed a request for special notice in this proceeding.

The proposed distribution of the estate includes one hundred percent to Petitioner.

Per Local Rule 10.07.12 Petitions for final distribution must include a report of the following: 1. That no federal or California estate taxes are payable or that they have been paid; 2. That income taxes and all other taxes (e.g. supplemental real property taxes or personal property taxes, if any, have been paid or otherwise provided for. If estate taxes are payable or paid: 1) the petition shall set forth whether said taxes were prorated pursuant to Probate Code section 20100, et seq., or the provisions of the will; and 2) the petition must reflect whether or not there are non-probate assets includable in the gross estate for estate tax purposes.

Petitioner confirms that no federal or California estate taxes are payable, nor are any California or federal income or personal property taxes payable. Petitioner states no claims were filed against the estate and all debts of the decedent and of the estate have been paid; however, U.S. Bank National Association filed two Creditor’s Claims on December 4, 2025. It is unclear whether these claims have been satisfied. Additionally, U.S. Bank was not served with Notice of the Hearing.

August 17, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

The Petition requests:

1. The administration of the estate be brought to a close without the requirement of an accounting; 2. All reported acts and proceedings of the Petitioner as herein set forth be confirmed and approved; 3. Distribution of the estate in Petitioner’s hands and any other property of decedent or the estate not now known or discovered be made to the person(s) and or entities entitled to it as set forth in the Petition; and 4. Upon filing of receipts and the Ex Parte Petition for Discharge, Petition may be discharged and released from all liability that may be incurred thereafter.

TENTATIVE RULING #12: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR BY ZOOM, PLEASE CONTACT THE COURT AT (530) 621-5867 AND MEETING INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED.

18

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share