DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV3424·eldorado·Civil·Contract
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

WOPUMNES NISENAN AND MEWUK HERITAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF EL DORADO COUNTY vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ET AL

Transfer Venue

Hearing date
Apr 17, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWopumnes Nisenan and Mewuk Heritage Preservation Society of El Dorado County
DefendantCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture

Ruling

April 17, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings

2. 25CV3424 WOPUMNES NISENAN AND MEWUK HERITAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF EL DORADO COUNTY vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ET AL Transfer Venue/Stay Proceedings

This is an unopposed motion to transfer the venue of this matter to Sacramento County pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 396b(a), which provides:

Except as otherwise provided in Section 396a, if an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.

According to the motion Defendant is headquartered in Sacramento County, and venue is proper there for this contract action. Code of Civil Procedure § 395. TENTATIVE RULING #2: DEFENDANT’S MOTION IS GRANTED; THE MATTER SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED.

CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING. LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M.

LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG

April 17, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings

CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share