INDAP v. LAKELAND VILLAGE OWNERS ASSN., ET AL.
Demurrer; Motion to Strike
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR MAY 22, 2026
2. INDAP v. LAKELAND VILLAGE OWNERS ASSN., ET AL., 25CV1407
(A) Demurrer (See Related Item Nos. 1 & 3)
(B) Motion to Strike (See Related Item Nos. 1 & 3)
On April 9, 2026, defendants Lakeland Village Owners Association and The Helsing
Group filed a demurrer and motion to strike against plaintiff Abhijit Indap’s complaint.
On May 11, 2026, the deadline for plaintiff’s opposition brief, plaintiff filed a first
amended complaint. As a result of the filing of the first amended complaint, the court
overrules the demurrer and denies the motion to strike as moot.
TENTATIVE RULING # 2: DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER IS OVERRULED AS MOOT.
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED AS MOOT. NO HEARING ON THIS
MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247),
UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS
TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE
TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS
ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY
TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR
TO OR AT THE HEARING.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”