HAMILTON v. HEAVENLY VALLEY, LP
Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Susanna Barron
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR APRIL 3, 2026
1. HAMILTON v. HEAVENLY VALLEY, LP, SC20210148
Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Susanna Barron
On February 03, 2026, Rebecca Peterson-Fisher submitted a declaration stating that
the application and payment were being contemporaneously filed with the State Bar of
California. (Peterson-Fisher Decl., ¶ 3.)
A hearing was set for March 20, 2026. On March 19, 2026, the court issued a
tentative ruling stating there was no proof of service in the court’s file showing that the
application was served upon the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office, or proof of payment of the application fee to the State Bar. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40,
subds. (c)(1), (e).) There were no appearances at the March 20 hearing, despite
appearances being required. The court continued the matter to April 3, 2026.
To date, the required documents are still not in the court’s file.
TENTATIVE RULING # 1: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 1:30 P.M., FRIDAY,
APRIL 3, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT FOUR.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”