DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26FL0139·eldorado·Civil·Epstein Credits
Hearing 4 months agoRESERVED

ALLISON SMITH WALKER V. MELVIN WALKER

Request for Order (RFO) for Epstein credits

Hearing date
Apr 23, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,585.45

Parties

PlaintiffAllison Smith Walker
DefendantMelvin Walker

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 23, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

22. ALLISON SMITH WALKER V. MELVIN WALKER 26FL0139

Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO), on February 26, 2026, seeking Epstein credits in the amount of $1,585.45. Petitioner was personally served with some, but not all the required forms on March 3, 2026.

Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration on April 8, 2026. Petitioner is seeking reimbursement for post separation expenses she incurred.

Respondent filed Responsive Declaration, which he has titled a Reply Declaration on April 16, 2026. Although it was stamped as Late Filed, the court finds as a Reply Declaration, it is timely. Petitioner was served on April 17, 2026

The court finds these are issues for trial as the court will need to take evidence and testimony from the parties. The court reserves on both parties’ requests for reimbursement until the time of trial.

Respondent is directed to prepare the Findings and Orders After Hearing (FOAH); however, this order is effective immediately upon the court’s adoption of the tentative ruling and is not conditioned on the preparation of the FOAH.

TENTATIVE RULING #22: THE COURT FINDS THESE ARE ISSUES FOR TRIAL AS THE COURT WILL NEED TO TAKE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY FROM THE PARTIES. THE COURT RESERVES ON BOTH PARTIES’ REQUESTS FOR REIMBURSEMENT UNTIL THE TIME OF TRIAL.

RESPONDENT IS DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING (FOAH); HOWEVER, THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON THE COURT’S ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IS NOT CONDITIONED ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOAH.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share