DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22FL1202·eldorado·Civil·Spousal Support
Hearing 4 months agoDENIED

SARAH MACCHIA V. GEORGE MACCHIA

Request for Order (RFO) for spousal support

Hearing date
Apr 23, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffSarah Macchia
DefendantGeorge Macchia

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 23, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

9. SARAH MACCHIA V. GEORGE MACCHIA 22FL1202

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on February 6, 2026 seeking spousal support. The RFO was personally served along with the Notice of Tentative Ruling on March 27th. Petitioner filed her Income and Expense Declaration on February 2nd, however there is no Proof of Service for this document therefore the court cannot consider it.

“For all hearings involving child, spousal, or domestic partner support, both parties must complete, file, and serve a current Income and Expense Declaration.” Cal. Rule Ct. 5.260(1); See also Cal. Fam. Code §2100. The party requesting support shall file and serve their Income and Expense Declaration with the initial moving papers. El Dorado Sup. Ct. Rule 8.03.01. Here, while Petitioner did file an Income and Expense Declaration days prior to filing her RFO, because it was never served, the court cannot consider it and therefore it does not satisfy the procedural requirements as set forth in Rules of Court rule 5.260(1), Family Code § 2100, and County Rule 8.03.01. Accordingly, the RFO is denied due to failure to serve the required documents.

TENTATIVE RULING #9: THE RFO IS DENIED DUE TO FAILURE TO SERVE THE REQUIRED INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share