DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25FL0122·eldorado·Civil·Family Law
Hearing 10 months agoParties ordered to appear

MEGAN DOYLE V. GRANT DOUGLAS DAKIN

Request for Order

Hearing date
Oct 9, 2025
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMEGAN DOYLE
DefendantGRANT DOUGLAS DAKIN

Ruling

2. MEGAN DOYLE V. GRANT DOUGLAS DAKIN 25FL0122

On January 7, 2026, Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) and his Income and Expense Declaration. All required documents were served on January 29th.

On March 10th, Petitioner filed her Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and her Income and Expense Declaration. They were served on March 9th. The court finds this to be late filed pursuant to Civil Procedure section 1005(b) which states all opposition papers are to be filed at least nine court days before the hearing date. Section 12c states, “[w]here any law requires an act to be performed no later than a specified number of days before a hearing date, the last day to perform that act shall be determined by counting backward from the hearing date, excluding the day of the hearing as provided by Section 12.” Cal. Civ. Pro. § 12c. Section 1005(b) in conjunction with Section 12c would have made March 6th the last day for filing the Responsive Declaration therefore it is late filed and cannot be considered by the court.

The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing.

TENTATIVE RULING #2: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share