DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-CIV-03215·sanmateo·Civil·Labor & Employment
Hearing todayGRANTED

MATTHEW PACLEB, INDIVUDALLY AND ON BEHALF OF AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT VS SALT & STRAW, LLC

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND, ONLY IF NEEDED, TO LIFT STAY

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
04
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffMATTHEW PACLEB
DefendantSALT & STRAW, LLC

Attorneys

RYAN T. CHUMANfor Plaintiff
MARK D KEMPLEfor Defendant

Ruling

August 18, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 33 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 ________________________________________________________________________

2:00 PM LINE 11 26-CIV-03215 MATTHEW PACLEB, INDIVUDALLY AND ON BEHALF OF AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT VS SALT & STRAW, LLC

MATTHEW PACLEB, INDIVUDALLY AND ON BEHALF OF AGGRIEVED RYAN T. CHUMAN EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SALT & STRAW, LLC MARK D KEMPLE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND, ONLY IF NEEDED, TO LIFT STAY

TENTATIVE RULING:

See tentative ruling on motion to consolidate in case no. 26Civ01212, which tentative ruling is incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share