Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITY OF LAKE MOTION LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-
ELSINORE vs MITCHELL COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:
Motion is Off Calendar.
The Defendant has filed an appeal. The Court of Appeal has issued a Palma notice directing that the proceedings be Stayed pending determination of the appeal on the merits.
Matter is set for a Status Conference on June 9, 2027, at 8:30am, D-4.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND REQUEST FOR ADMISSION, SET CALDERON vs CITY OF TWO RESPONSE TO REQUESTS CVRI2303538 MENIFEE FOR ADMISSION, SET TWO, NO. 50 (ERRONEOUSLY NUMBERED 51) Tentative Ruling:
GRANT
The City has established an excusable mistake in its response to RFA2 No.50 and Plaintiff will not be unduly prejudiced by the amended response.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT’S FURTHER LAMBERT vs BMW OF CVRI2506588 RESPONSES TO SPECIAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC INTERROGATORIES NOS. 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 AND 13; Tentative Ruling:
GRANT as to Special Interrogatories nos. 2, 6, 9,11 and 13.
BMW’s response to no. 2 is not responsive to the call of the question. For no. 6, if the question requires reference to another document, the document should be identified and its contents summarized. In no. 9, BMW’s response is vague. Does BMW maintain there are no defects that are responsive, or does BMW maintain only there are no
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”