| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Bifurcation of status of marriage; Trial setting
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 KRISTEN MARIE PORRAS,) Case Number: FDI-24-800108) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 12, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 SIXTO CHRISTOPHER PORRAS,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: BIFURCATION OF STATUS OF MARRIAGE; TRIAL SETTING 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The Court finds good cause to vacate the 5/12/26 hearing on Petitioner’s 1/7/26 Request for Order (file 15 dated 1/5/26) seeking bifurcation of trial on permanent custody and visitation and termination of marital 16 status as the Court finds the issues are MOOT for the following reasons: (a) on 3/5/26 the Court issued 17 custody and visitation orders (see Findings and Order After Hearing filed 3/19/26); and (b) on 4/10/26 the 18 parties filed a Stipulation and Order agreeing to terminate marital status, which was entered by the Court. 19 No appearances are required on 5/12/26. 20
24
28
29
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.