Notice Of Motion To Compel Plaintiff Jessica Jewell'S Compliance With Prior Responses To Defendant'S Request For Production Of Documents [Set One]
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, Line 8. Defendant Joyce Wing Yin Leung's Motion To Compel Plaintiff Jessica Jewell's Compliance With Prior Responses To Defendant's Request For Production Of Documents is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Defendant moves under Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.210, which provides: "The party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed shall respond separately to each item or category of item by any of the following: (1) A statement that the party will comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling by the date set for the inspection, copying, testing, or sampling pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 2031.030 and any related activities. (2) A representation that the party lacks the ability to comply with the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of a particular item or category of item. (3) An objection to the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling."
Defendant moves, as well, under Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.320. Section 2031.320(a) provides: "If a party filing a response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling under Sections 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, and 2031.280 thereafter fails to permit the inspection, copying, testing, or sampling in accordance with that party's statement of compliance, the demanding party may move for an order compelling compliance."
Defendant contends Plaintiff's production was incomplete. As to the production in response to the following RFPs, Defendant failed to demonstrate Plaintiff's production was incomplete: RFP, nos. 10, 20, 30, 31, 51,
As to the production in response to the following RFPs, Defendant has demonstrated Plaintiff's production was incomplete and further production is required: RFP, no. 11, Further production in consistent with response to RFP, no. 11 no later than 15 days after notice of this order. Plaintiff's "jurisdiction" objection is overruled.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.)
To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |