Notice Of Motion And Application For Stay Of Unlawful Detainer Proceedings Pending Determination In Corordinate Probate Proceedings
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681160 - August 13, 2026 Hearing date: August 13, 2026 Case number: CUD26681160 Case title: MARK GIRAUDO VS. THE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681160 | Case Title: | | MARK GIRAUDO VS. THE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Application For Stay Of Unlawful Detainer Proceedings Pending Determination In Corordinate Probate Proceedings | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 13, 2026. Line 13.2.
DEFENDANT KATHERINE PAPAGEORGE Notice Of Motion And Application For Stay Of Unlawful Detainer Proceedings Pending Determination In Corordinate Probate Proceedings is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service on file. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005(b). No supporting memorandum filed with the notice of motion, despite reference to a supporting memorandum in the notice of motion (see CRC 3.1113).=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”