WELLS FARGO BANK NA vs MADRIGAL, LEA A

CV-24-004360 - PLAZA SERVICES LLC vs SHANKAR, VEENA - Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Defendant's Default Under Settlement and Release Agreement - DENIED without prejudice.

Plaintiff's motion fails to demonstrate proof of service on Defendant. Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 (b). Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice.

CV-25-007352 - WELLS FARGO BANK NA vs MADRIGAL, LEA A - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment - GRANTED.

After full consideration of the evidence adduced, and the written submissions by the Plaintiff, and Defendant, the Court finds that Plaintiff's moving evidence establishes Defendant's indebtedness to Plaintiff in respect of Defendant's credit card issued to Defendant by Plaintiff, and purchases made thereon per the credit card agreement between the parties.

Further, that Defendant has defaulted in repayment on said credit card to Plaintiff.(Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Nos. 1-12; Civ. Proc. Code Sec. 437(c) (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co., (2001), 25 Cal. 4th 826, 850, as modified (July 11, 2001); Coyote Aviation Corp. v. City of Redlands, (2025)111 Cal. App. 5th 955; Evid. Code Sec. 1271; Greenspan v. LADT, LLC (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 486, rehearing denied, review denied.

The Court further finds the absence of a triable issue of material fact regarding Defendant's said indebtedness to Plaintiff. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment in its favor herein.

Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS judgment in favor of Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank.NA and against Defendant Lea A. Madrigal in the instant matter for the sum of $7,528.42.

The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings for Department 19***