Kitts vs. Toyo Suisan Kaisha, LTD

TENTATIVE RULINGS 8/13/2026 02:00 PM

100 Maul vs. THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION, a California corporation;

2022-01241473 Final Accounting

The settlement administrator, Simpluris, Inc., has confirmed that the distribution of the settlement funds has been completed and made in accordance with the terms of the settlement that were approved by the Court.

As Plaintiffs have shown that the administrator’s work is complete, the Court’s file may now be closed.

Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant. 101 Zepeda vs. Broker Soultions, Inc.

2019-01051868 Final Accounting

The court finds all settlement distribution efforts are fully concluded. The administrator’s final report (ROA 353) is thus approved, and the court’s file will be closed.

Plaintiff to give notice of the court’s ruling, including to the LWDA, within five (5) calendar days, and file proof of service. Plaintiff to also file proof of service of ROA 353 on the LWDA. 102 Kitts vs. Toyo Suisan Kaisha, LTD

2026-01567402 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Plaintiff Tenisha Johnson individually and as Guardian ad litem on behalf of M.T., a minor’s application for pro hac vice admission of attorney Joshua R. Harris is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED upon counsel’s submission, within 3 court days of this ruling, of a declaration attesting that the applicable fees have been paid to the State Bar of California pursuant to Rules of Court, rule 9.40(e).

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if this attorney remains counsel for the moving party, the moving party must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving party shall provide notice.