Petition for Writ
proof of service of the moving papers be filed with the court no later than 5 court days before the date set for the hearing.
No later than 5 court days before the continued hearing date, Plaintiff is ordered to file a proof of service of the motion. 9 24-01397104 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication
Doyle vs. Waldorf CONTINUED Astoria Monarch Beach & Resort Club 10 24-01440278 Motion to Comply
Hong vs. Mercedes- Benz USA, LLC 11 26-01542892 Petition for Writ
Hovarter vs. Monarch CONTINUED Heavy Haul Corporation 12 25-01523245 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
ICK International, Inc. vs. Jang The motion of attorney S. Young Lim and Jessie Y. Kim to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendant Byungchul Jang is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc. § 284, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)
Attorneys will be relieved as counsel of record for client effective upon filing of a proof of service of the signed order on client. Additionally, prior to being relieved, counsel must provide Plaintiff’s counsel with the last known address, telephone number, and email address of Jang.
Moving attorneys are to give notice.
13 25-01461247 1) Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2) Motion to Strike Portions Of Complaint Mike Bubalo Construction CO,. Inc Defendants Yorba Linda Water District, Reza Afshar, and Rosanne vs. Yorba Linda Water Weston’s Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) is District SUSTAINED without leave to amend.
The 2nd cause of action requests a writ of mandate to withdraw or modify a performance evaluation.
“The exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine applies when there is an administrative remedy to questionable government action. It assures certain prerequisites are met before legal action is taken. Where an administrative remedy is provided by statute, relief must first be sought from the administrative body. This is a fundamental rule of procedure followed under the doctrine of stare decisis, and binding upon all courts. A court's intervention before an administrative agency has resolved the claim constitutes jurisdictional interference. Courts have no discretion to relax the exhaustion doctrine.” (
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”