Looney v. Harsiddhi Foods Inc.

granted in the amount of $1,500 against Plaintiffs’ attorneys of record, Strategic Legal Practices, APC, who is directed to pay them to Defendant’s counsel within 15 business days of this order. GM’s counsel is directed to submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312.

2. 25CV03160, Looney v. Harsiddhi Foods Inc.

(TENTATIVE ISSUED BY HON. OSCAR A. PARDO)

IF ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED, MATTER WILL BE HEARD IN DEPT.

19. PLEASE USE DEPT. 19’S ZOOM LOGIN INFORMATION (SEE BOTTOM OF PAGE).

Plaintiff Gary E. Looney, dba Collectronics of California (“Plaintiff”) moves for an order compelling Defendants Harsiddhi Foods, Inc. dba VJ’s Sports Bar X Pizza and Varun Limbachiya, individually as personal guarantor of Harsiddhi Foods Inc. (“Defendants”), to furnish responses to Plaintiff’s First Set of Post Judgment Interrogatories and Plaintiff’s Post Judgment Demand for Production of Documents and Tangible Things. Plaintiff requests sanctions in the amount of $60. On September 23, 2025, Plaintiff obtained a judgment against Defendants in the amount of $5,252.37.

On October 13, 2025, Plaintiff served Defendants with form interrogatories and a request for production of documents. (Looney Decl. ¶1, Ex. A.) As of the date of the motion, no responses have been provided. (Id., at ¶¶2-4.) The motion is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to provide responses, without objections, to Plaintiff’s discovery requests and to pay sanctions in the amount of $60 within 30 days of this order. The court will sign the proposed order.

3. 25CV04758, Garcia v. LCS Community Employment, LLC

(TENTATIVE ISSUED BY HON. JANE GASKELL)

IF ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED, MATTER WILL BE HEARD IN DEPT.

17. PLEASE USE DEPT. 17’S ZOOM LOGIN INFORMATION (SEE BOTTOM OF PAGE).

This matter is on calendar for the motion of Defendant LCS Community Employment LLC to sever Plaintiffs’ claims or, in the alternative, to order separate trials. This matter was originally heard on March 25, 2026, and was continued for proof of service showing service of the motion after it was filed or of notice of the hearing. As of the time the court reviewed this matter, proof of service had not been filed. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED. This court’s minute order shall constitute the order of the court.