Kimberly Kullen vs. Uber Technologies, Inc.

To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to

Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 18CV326093 RE:1603 Cortez Trustees petition this court order a claims bar date. A petition and declaration of 1 Street, Milpitas, CA unresolved claims was filed on April 3, 2018. No claims have been filed. The petition to order a claims bar date is GRANTED. Court requests more information from counsel to set a date.

9:00 23CV425985 Kimberly Kullen vs. Defendant moves this court to stay proceedings pending appeal. Plaintiff filed this 2 Uber Technologies, complaint on November 9, 2023 alleging premises liability and public entity liability Inc. arising from injuries she sustained when a sign fell and struck her at the San Jose International Airport. Defendant petitioned this court to compel arbitration. In December of 2025, this court denied defendant’s petition. Defendant appealed this court’s decision. SB 365 allows this court the discretion to deny staying of proceedings pending an appellate ruling. Defendant does not meet its burden of showing how it will be prejudiced by continuing litigation in this matter. The court is more convinced that Plaintiff will be prejudiced by delaying a case that has been in court now for almost three years. Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

9:00 24CV444665 Wilson Catalan vs. See below. 3 Ford Motor Company, et.al.

9:00 24CV447032 Thanh Tran, et.al. vs. Off calendar.- 4 American Honda Motor Company

9:00 25CV458952 Carlos Perea vs. Defendant moves this court to dismiss case. Plaintiff has failed to respond to court 5 General Motors,LLC order from November 18, 2025 to produce documents. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to this motion. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant’s request for attorney costs is GRANTED.

9:00 25CV461251 JP Morgan Chase See below. 6 Bank vs. Ryan Ourique

9:00 24CV453635 Brandon Hilburn vs. See below. 7 Ford Motor Company

9:01 20CV373187 Austin Erlich v. Defendant moves this court for exemption from wage garnishment. On January 13, 1 Wahid Shah 2026, this court denied defendant’s motion for exemption, but reduced monthly payment. On May 7. 2026, this court restored the original amount of wage garnishment without objection from the defendant. The issue of exemption is res judicata. Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

2