| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25628326 - May 4, 2026 Hearing date: May 4, 2026 Case number: CGC25628326 Case title: BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY VS. CORE: SF LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628326 | Case Title: | | BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY VS. CORE: SF LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | 1 - MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE BY BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MICHAEL SHVO, JASON LUCAS, SHVO CONCEPTS, LLC, SHVO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, DEUTSCHE FINANCE AMERICA LLC | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 4, 2026.
Line 3.1. MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE BY BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MICHAEL SHVO, JASON LUCAS, SHVO CONCEPTS, LLC, SHVO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, DEUTSCHE FINANCE AMERICA LLC is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”