| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
First Amended Notice Of Motion For Order Compelling Reasonable Accomodation And Temporary Housing
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 29, 2026. Line 4. PLAINTIFF GARY ERWIN First Amended Notice Of Motion For Order Compelling Reasonable Accomodation And Temporary Housing is MOOT.
The Court interprets Plaintiff's motion as a request for a preliminary injunction. The specific need for the requested injunctive relief is based on the conduct of one of Plaintiff's neighbors, who, as of the hearing on this motion, no longer lives there. Therefore, the motion, as framed in Plaintiff's moving papers, is moot, and the Court does not address the substantive arguments raised in the parties' briefings.
Plaintiff's supplemental filings, asserting new bases for the relief which are different from the reason described in Plaintiff's moving papers, are stricken. Although the Court does not grant the relief requested, the Court makes no determination as to the propriety or impropriety of Defendants' actions regarding Plaintiff's request for reasonable accommodation. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”