DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622004·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

HSH HOLDING LLC VS. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Apr 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHSH HOLDING LLC
DefendantAMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
DefendantKARAN CHAWLA
DefendantHONOR INSURANCE AGENCY

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 24, 2026. Line 3. DEFENDANT KARAN CHAWLA, HONOR INSURANCE AGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT is continued to May 21, 2026 for parties to comply with SFLR 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of their respective filings in support of and in opposition to the demurrer no later than May 8, 2026 with cover letters reflecting new hearing date. (The only courtesy copy received is the moving party's proposed order).=(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share