DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631277·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

CUONG VAN DUONG ET AL VS. MARY TRAN ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-631625, CGC-25-631956, CGC-25-632299, CGC-25-632305 WITH CASE CGC-25-631277

Hearing date
Apr 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCUONG VAN DUONG
DefendantMARY TRAN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 23, 2026. Line 14. DEFENDANT MARY TRAN AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-631625, CGC-25-631956, CGC-25-632299, CGC-25-632305 WITH CASE CGC-25-631277 is GRANTED as follows: (1) cases CGC-25-631277 and CGC-25-631625 are consolidated for all purposes. Case CGC-25-631277 shall be the lead case; (2) all five cases consolidated for discovery and trial purposes. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share