DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610891·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Sanctions Under Ccp 128.8 Against Defendant Arthur Traynor

Hearing date
Apr 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH LEWIS
DefendantKENNETH RUNYON
DefendantARTHUR TRAYNOR

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 23, 2026. Line 3. PLAINTIFF SARAH LEWIS Notice Of Motion And Motion For Sanctions Under Ccp 128.8 Against Defendant Arthur Traynor is re-noticed for May 15, 2026 per Plaintiff's Notice of Continuance. The Court makes no determination as to the propriety of Plaintiff's Notice of Continuance at this time. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share