KIM VS. TRAN

have not had a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery and prepare for trial, nor have the other parties had a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery and prepare for trial in regard to the new parties’ involvement in the case. This is sufficient to show good cause.

Defendant seeks to continue trial until April 5, 2027. Plaintiff has shown that it will be prejudiced by continuance until April 2027 since this action was filed in December 2022 and it was Defendants that failed to add and serve the additional indispensable parties until now. Further, Plaintiff contends that with each passing day, the defects at the property continue to worsen.

Based on the foregoing, the Court will grant continuance until February 2027. Trial is CONTINUED to 2/12/27 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. C32.

Moving Defendant to give notice.

11. KIM VS. TRAN 2026-01566561 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

Plaintiff Harinne Kim’s Motion is CONTINUED to 8/25/26 at 9:00 a.m., in Dept. C32. Plaintiff failed to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(A). Rule 3.350(a)(1)(A) is mandatory; thus Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a code compliant notice by August 14, 2026. The Court shortens the required notice period to seven (7) court days to accommodate the hearing date.

12. WEBER VS. MORADO 2025-01511904 DEMURRER TO AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT

Defendants/cross-complainants Corinne Morado, Gencare Connects, Inc., and Daian Corporation’s Demurrer to Plaintiffs Rosalie Lu Weber and Rudolf Weber’s First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part with 20 days leave to amend.

First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract

“To state a cause of action for breach of contract, a party must plead the existence of a contract, his or her performance of the contract or excuse for nonperformance, the defendant’s breach and resulting damage.” (Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 299, 307 [citation omitted].) Plaintiffs allege the parties entered into two stock sale agreements and Defendants breached those agreements, which resulted in damages to Plaintiffs. (FAC ¶¶ 97-103.) Plaintiffs also allege Defendants breached two separate oral agreements. (FAC ¶ 104.)