CHOU VS. FCA US LLC

5 CHOU VS. FCA US LLC 2025-01510392 MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Jennifer Weiling Chou and Daniel Joel Gordineer’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Initial Disclosures is CONTINUED to 9/22/26 at 9:00 a.m., in Dept. C32. Defendant produced numerous documents in response to its initial disclosure obligations. Plaintiffs seek additional documents he claims are responsive but were not produced and verifications. The parties are ordered to engage in additional meet and confer efforts, including an in-person, telephone, or videoconference meeting of counsel, no later than 30 calendar days prior to the continued hearing date.

If Defendant agrees to serve supplemental responses, Defendant shall serve supplemental verified responses and produce additional documents no later than 20 calendar days prior to the continued hearing date. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file and serve a supplemental declaration, no later than 9 court days before the continued hearing date and not to exceed five pages, including: (1) a description of the parties’ additional attempts to meet and confer; (2) attaching a copy of Defendant’s supplemental responses, if any; and (3) a concise description of any remaining dispute including identification of the specific requests which remain in dispute.

Defendant’s counsel may file a responsive supplemental declaration, not to exceed three pages, no later than 5 calendar days before the continued hearing date.

6. KTB SUNKIST LLC VS. TALT 2022-01284597 MOTION TO SETTING FAIR MARKET VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY Plaintiffs KTB Sunkist LLC, Karen T. Beardsley and Frank G. Beardsley as Co-Trustees of the Talt Family Trust of the Talt Family 1992 Trust dated April 9, 1992, Bypass TR B-Karen Beardsley TR (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), move for an order (a) setting the fair market value of the real property commonly known as: 1301, 1321 and 1341 South Sunkist Street, and 2419 East Winston Road, Anaheim, California 92806 (the “Property”) at $41,770,000 based on the appraisal process agreed upon by the parties and (b) sending notice to the Defendants that they may buy all the interests of the Plaintiffs pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 874.317.

The Parties agreed to an appraisal process to determine the fair market value of the Property. (Kimball Decl., ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Parties agreed to jointly retain three appraisers to determine the fair market value of the Property as fee simple, subject to encumbrances (leas ed fee), as if a single owner as of the date of the filing of this partition action (October 4, 2022). The two closest appraisals will be averaged, unless the highest and lowest appraisal are each within five (5) percent of the value reflected on the middle appraisal, in which case all three appraisals will be averaged. The resulting average will be the