FREMONT BANK, A CALIFORNIA STATE-CHARTERED BANK VS. ERICK FERNANDO CRESPO ET AL
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Renewed)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680307 - April 21, 2026 Hearing date: April 21, 2026 Case number: CUD25680307 Case title: FREMONT BANK, A CALIFORNIA STATE-CHARTERED BANK VS. ERICK FERNANDO CRESPO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680307 | Case Title: | | FREMONT BANK, A CALIFORNIA STATE-CHARTERED BANK VS. ERICK FERNANDO CRESPO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Renewed) | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Motion calendar for April 21, 2026, line 7.
Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, subject to oral opposition, if any. Moving party shifted their burden. Opposing party did not file any opposition prior to the original hearing date. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”