DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24620014·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC VS. 1000 VAN NESS LP, 1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal Portions Of Its Cross-Complaint And Exhibits

Hearing date
Apr 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant1000 VAN NESS LP
Defendant1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Cross-DefendantSite Centers Corp.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24620014 - April 17, 2026 Hearing date: April 17, 2026 Case number: CGC24620014 Case title: 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC VS. 1000 VAN NESS LP,1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24620014 | Case Title: | | 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC VS. 1000 VAN NESS LP,1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal Portions Of Its Cross-Complaint And Exhibits [California Rules Of Court 2.550 And 2.551]; And Memorandum In Support | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Motion calendar for April 17, 2026, line 7.

Cross Defendant Site Centers Corp.'s Motion to Seal Portions of its Cross-Complaint and Exhibits [CRC 2.550 and 2.551] is continued to April 28, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share