DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610531·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR VS. WAR HORSE GOLDEN GATE LLC F/K/A WEWORK GOLDEN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve The Sale Of Real Property Commonly Known As 25 Taylor Street, San Francisco, California

Hearing date
Apr 16, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
DefendantWAR HORSE GOLDEN GATE LLC F/K/A WEWORK GOLDEN ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610531 - April 16, 2026 Hearing date: April 16, 2026 Case number: CGC23610531 Case title: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR VS. WAR HORSE GOLDEN GATE LLC F/K/A WEWORK GOLDEN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610531 | Case Title: | | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR VS. WAR HORSE GOLDEN GATE LLC F/K/A WEWORK GOLDEN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve The Sale Of Real Property Commonly Known As 25 Taylor Street, San Francisco, California; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities |

Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Law and Motion calendar for April 16, 2026, line 2. Receiver's Motion to Approve Sale of Real Property is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share