DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25277362·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 4 months agoPlease see the tentative ruling for Line 2 = (304/EPS).

DAVID MARSHALL ET AL VS. FMC CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-277301 WITH CASE CGC-25-277362

Hearing date
Apr 14, 2026
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDAVID MARSHALL
PlaintiffDARLD MARSHALL
PlaintiffSHERROL SLOAN
PlaintiffKRANESHA ANDERSON
PlaintiffSANDRA BLACK
DefendantFMC CORPORATION

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC25277362 - April 14, 2026 Hearing date: April 14, 2026 Case number: CGC25277362 Case title: DAVID MARSHALL ET AL VS. FMC CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25277362 | Case Title: | | DAVID MARSHALL ET AL VS. FMC CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-14 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-277301 WITH CASE CGC-25-277362 | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday April 14, 2026, in Department 304, Line 5. PLAINTIFF DAVID MARSHALL, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF DARLD MARSHALL, DECEASED, SHERROL SLOAN, KRANESHA ANDERSON, SANDRA BLACK MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-277301 WITH CASE CGC-25-277362. Please see the tentative ruling for Line 2 = (304/EPS). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share