DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD22670457·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 4 months agoMOOT

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW VS. ANGIE ROYCE CHEATHAM-SANDERS ET AL

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS

Hearing date
Apr 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW
DefendantANGIE ROYCE CHEATHAM-SANDERS
DefendantRICHARD BROWN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 13, 2026. Line 6. DEFENDANT RICHARD BROWN MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS is MOOT. Defendant Brown has generally appeared in this action by filing a pre-judgment claim of right and an answer in 2024, and has thereby submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court. Supplemental brief filed April 6, 2026 is stricken, as no supplemental filings were authorized. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share