Motion for attorneys’ fees
95678. With those changes, the court also approves the proposed form of notice attached as Exhibit C to the February 20, 2026 declaration of counsel Friedman.
For the purposes of the settlement, the court hereby certifies the class as “all persons within the United States who purchased the following Thinkware Products between January 25, 2019 and August 31, 2024: X700 dash cams, F200PRO dash cams, DC-M2- FG-IR dash cams, DC-M2-FG dash cams, and F70PRO dash cams,” excluding members of the court, class counsel, Thinkware and its employees and agents.
The court preliminarily appoints and designates Jessica Ratzak as the class representative. The court preliminarily appoints and designates Adrian R. Bacon and Todd M. Friedman of the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. as class counsel. The court appoints and designates Eisner Advisory Group, LLC as the settlement administrator.
The court also incorporates by reference all findings and orders set forth in the Proposed Order submitted in connection with the instant motion.
The final approval hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32. The motion for final approval shall be filed and served in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b).
Case Management Conference
In light of the court’s above ruling granting preliminary approval, no appearance is required and no further case management conference is scheduled at this time.
7. S-CV-0050702 SVLA LLC v. Mark Tanner Construction Inc.
Defendant Jason Wooley dba Lot C Architecture’s Motion for Summary Judgment / Adjudication and Defendant Mark Tanner Construction, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Adjudication is continued to August 25, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32.
8. S-CV-0051163 France, Jason v. Powers, Bridget
The motion for attorneys’ fees is continued to August 20, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 3 to be heard by the Honorable Michael W. Jones. No further briefing is permitted.
9. S-CV-0055053 Jacobson, Annika v. Warren T Eich Middle School
Roseville City School District’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
Defendant Roseville City School District (district) demurs to the second cause of action in the first amended complaint, which is the only cause of action alleged against the district, on the basis that plaintiffs fail to allege the essential elements of a claim for
4
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”