Notice Of Motion To Compel Answers To Supplemental Discovery Requests
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26680943 - August 10, 2026 Hearing date: August 10, 2026 Case number: CUD26680943 Case title: CITIBROKERS REAL ESTATE, INC. VS. ELAINE COYLE-WEIL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26680943 | Case Title: | | CITIBROKERS REAL ESTATE, INC. VS. ELAINE COYLE-WEIL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Answers To Supplemental Discovery Requests | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 10, 2026. Line 13.
Defendants' Motion to Compel Answer to Supplemental Discovery Requests is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Plaintiff shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Defendants' Supplemental Form Interrogatory; Supplemental Request for Production of Documents; and Supplemental Special Interrogatory within 5 days of notice of entry of order. Sanctions granted in the amount of $666.
Defendants' counsel is admonished to comply with CRC 3.1110(f)(3), i.e., by including exhibit tabs, in connection with all future courtesy copies provided to the Court.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”