Ex Parte Application to Advance Motion to Compel Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. Further Responses to SROG1 and RPD2
26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/10/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Advance Motion to Compel Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. Further Responses to SROG1 and RPD2; (CRS# 000217868207) CRS# A-162809-022 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 08/10/2026 Patrick McKinney
On this specially-set ex parte calendar, Plaintiffs Jovy Menor and Bernard Menor seek to advance nine (9) hearings on motions to compel. Plaintiffs request that the court advance the hearings to August 25, 2026; this date is unavailable because the parties have previouslyscheduled six (6) motions in this case for hearing on that date, and other parties have previously reserved and set for hearing on August 25 five motions in other cases.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, to accommodate Plaintiffs requests, the jury trial in this matter is continued to September 22, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 36(f).) The dates for the close of fact and expert discovery are not extended by this trial continuance.
The Jury Trial scheduled for 09/08/2026 is continued to 09/22/2026 at 10:00 AM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
The Hearing on Motion to Compel Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. Further Responses to SROG1 and RPD2; filed by JOVY MENOR (Plaintiff) + CRS# 000217868207 scheduled for 10/29/2026 is reset to 08/27/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
Plaintiffs' counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”