DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615447·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

CURTIS ANDERSON ET AL VS. MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Set Aside Voluntary Dismissals Without Prejudice Of Eight Deceased Plaintiffs

Hearing date
Apr 8, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCURTIS ANDERSON
PlaintiffTERRENCE BANKS
PlaintiffIRMA BRADLEYSHAW
PlaintiffAARON BRUNDIGE
PlaintiffCHRISTINA CARDOZA
PlaintiffJOHNNY CRAWFORD
PlaintiffPAMELA DARDEN
PlaintiffTOMI DAVIS
PlaintiffTONY DELEMA
PlaintiffDIEGO DURAN
PlaintiffSHAWN BUCKMASTER
PlaintiffMATTHEW BYRD
DefendantMERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 8, 2026. Line 4. PLAINTIFF CURTIS ANDERSON, TERRENCE BANKS, IRMA BRADLEYSHAW, AARON BRUNDIGE, CHRISTINA CARDOZA, JOHNNY CRAWFORD, PAMELA DARDEN, TOMI DAVIS, TONY DELEMA, DIEGO DURAN, SHAWN BUCKMASTER, MATTHEW BYRD Notice Of Motion To Set Aside Voluntary Dismissals Without Prejudice Of Eight Deceased Plaintiffs is continued to April 28, 2026 to be heard with other pending motions. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share