DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681247·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 5 months agoGRANTED

TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC VS. TERRY MORGAN ET AL

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS

Hearing date
Apr 3, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC
DefendantTERRY MORGAN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 3, 2026. Line 8. DEFENDANT TERRY MORGAN MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS is GRANTED, subject to opposition, as follows: any purported personal service on Defendant Terry Morgan prior to March 20, 2026 is quashed. As Plaintiff has not yet filed a proof of service of summons, this order is limited and does not extend to any potential service other than that described above. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share