DEFENDANT AUBERGE RESORTS, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
“The prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees.” (Civ. Code, 8488, subd. (c).) To the extent judgment is in favor of Petitioners, the Court finds that the hourly rate charged by counsel, time spent preparing the Application, and court costs, for a total of $4,200 [= $525 / hr x 7 hrs + $525 costs] are reasonable. (See Declaration of Jason Luros, filed 7/6/26, at ¶¶ 9, 11-12.) The Court does not, however, grant estimated future fees. (See Id., ¶ 10.)
**at 9:30 a.m.** Maudie Pollatrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al 24CV001401
[1] DEFENDANT AUBERGE RESORTS, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
[2] DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and [3] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: All three matters are CONTINUED to August 25, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.
GUARDIANSHIP CALENDAR – Hon. Francisca P. Tisher, Dept. 6 (Criminal Courts Bldg. – 1111 Third St.) at 2:00 p.m.
Jorge Valdez Melgoza v. Maribel Melgoza Reza 26FL000385
[1] PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP
[2] REQUEST FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS
TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are GRANTED.
Jesus Valdez Melgoza v. Maribel Melgoza Reza 26FL000395
[1] PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP
[2] REQUEST FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS
TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are GRANTED.
7
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”