RICE v. McDONALD, et al.

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: AUGUST 7, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 23CV01425

RICE v. McDONALD, et al.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

The unopposed motion is granted. Defendant Tyler Colby shall serve responsive documents to the four categories of outstanding records in compliance with plaintiff’s civil subpoena for personal appearance and production of documents. (Motion, Exs. 2 and 3.) The documents shall be delivered to plaintiff within fifteen (15) days of service of the order on this motion. Plaintiff shall first resubmit a proposed order that includes the four categories of documents, so that defendant need not refer to any other document to determine what he is required to produce.

No. 24CV01870

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOC. LLC v. GERRITSON

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

The motion is continued to August 21, 2026, so that plaintiff can re-file its proof of service for the motion. The proof in the court record is illegible and does not establish that it was duly served on defendant. No further briefing is permitted by either party.