Order to Show Cause
30, 2026. The clerk shall serve notice of the order to show cause.
8. CU0001842 Charles Eugene Murdock vs. Jodi Michelle Andrews Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
9. CU0001891 Ghanshyam Pokal, et al. vs. Hardik A. Patel, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues this matter to October 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, and sets an order to show cause hearing for the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendants as ordered by this Court on March 2, 2026. The clerk shall serve notice of the order to show cause.
10. CU0001972 Cynthia Carter vs. Stone House, LLC, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to October 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.
11. CU0002023 Wendy Jean Robinson Jr v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to October 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.
12. CU0002146 The People Of The State Of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation vs. Mark James Lee, et al. Appearances are required. All parties shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to appear as directed on April 27, 2026, and why the complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to CCP 664.6(e).
13. CU0002229 Krystal Ukoh, et al. vs. State of California, et al. Appearances are required. Robert John Moreno shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear as directed on April 13, 2026 and failing to properly serve the cross-complaint.
14. CU0002492 Bank of America N.A. v. Prashant Tyagi No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to November 9, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.
15. CU0002718 Goepel, Zachary J v. U-Haul Co Of California, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to October 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”