DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681184·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

NP APARTMENTS, LLC VS. MARIA RAMIREZ ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Mar 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 13, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNP APARTMENTS, LLC
DefendantMARIA RAMIREZ

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681184 - March 23, 2026 Hearing date: March 23, 2026 Case number: CUD26681184 Case title: NP APARTMENTS, LLC VS. MARIA RAMIREZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681184 | Case Title: | | NP APARTMENTS, LLC VS. MARIA RAMIREZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 23, 2026. Line 6. DEFENDANT MARIA RAMIREZ DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is continued to May 13, 2026 per stipulation and order. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share