Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 7, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.
17. S-CV-0056439 KENDRICK, COREY v. HOOKED ON SOLAR
Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement
The unopposed motion is granted.
The court reviews the moving papers – along with the entirety of the court file – to determine that the settlement is genuine, meaningful, and consistent with the underlying purposes of the PAGA-related statute. (Labor Code section 2699(s)(2); O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016) 201 F.Supp.3d 1110.) The court must also determine whether the PAGA settlement appears fundamentally fair, reasonable, and adequate. (Ibid.) The court has carefully reviewed and considered the PAGA settlement and plaintiff’s moving papers filed in connection with the motion. The court determines a sufficient showing has been made that the settlement is fair, reasonable, genuine, meaningful, and consistent with the purpose of PAGA. The court incorporates by reference the findings and order outlined in the proposed order lodged on June 22, 2026.
///
PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”