NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH'S APPEARANCE, TESTIMONY, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD, ALBERT LEE, ESQ.
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC23607679 - August 7, 2026 Hearing date: August 7, 2026 Case number: CGC23607679 Case title: MAYA BLYTH VS. LEAL UGRIN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23607679 | Case Title: | | MAYA BLYTH VS. LEAL UGRIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-07 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH'S APPEARANCE, TESTIMONY, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD, ALBERT LEE, ESQ.; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (ADDED FOR POSTING OF TENTATIVE RULING) | Rulings: | | MATTER ON THE LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY CALENDAR FOR FRIDAY, AUG-07-2026.
LINE 3. 9-NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH'S APPEARANCE, TESTIMONY, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT DEPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF MAYA BLYTH AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD, ALBERT LEE, ESQ.; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (ADDED FOR POSTING OF TENTATIVE RULING)
Defendant Leal Ugrin's motion to compel plaintiff Maya Blyth to appear for deposition, produce documents, and pay sanctions is granted in part as stated herein.
First, the court concludes that this motion is timely unless Blyth's objections to the notice of deposition were valid. Where a deponent fails to answer a question at deposition, the deposing party must make a motion to compel the response within 60 days after the completion of the record of deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 2025.480, subds. (a), (b).) Where a deponent fails to appear upon service of a deposition notice "without having served a valid objection," the party seeking the deposition may move to compel, and there is no statutory deadline. (Id., sec. 2025.450, subd. (a).) The party must meet and confer. (Id., subd. (b)(2).)
***THE COURT HAS EMAILED THE COMPLETE TENTATIVE RULING TO THE PARTIES***
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”