DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD18662196·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoDENIED

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB VS. EMIL P MILYAKOV ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Orders Granting Plaintiff'S Motions For Summary Judgment And To Bar Entry Of Judgments

Hearing date
Mar 19, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
DefendantEMIL P MILYAKOV
DefendantNEVENNA APOSTOLOVA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD18662196 - March 19, 2026 Hearing date: March 19, 2026 Case number: CUD18662196 Case title: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB VS. EMIL P MILYAKOV ET AL Case Number: | | CUD18662196 | Case Title: | | WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB VS. EMIL P MILYAKOV ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Orders Granting Plaintiff'S Motions For Summary Judgment And To Bar Entry Of Judgments | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 19, 2026. Line 2.1.

DEFENDANT NEVENNA APOSTOLOVA Motion To Vacate Orders Granting Plaintiff'S Motions For Summary Judgment And To Bar Entry Of Judgments is DENIED. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share