Child Custody; Visitation
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 DANIEL ZIVNEY,) Case Number: FDI-25-802197) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: August 6, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CAROLYN HO,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) Daniel Zivney (Father) and Respondent Carolyn Ho (Mother) have one minor child together, Tai 18 (DOB 3/9/2016, age 10). 19 2) On for hearing is Father’s ex parte request for joint legal custody and sole physical custody of Tai 20 with parenting time for Mother from Friday school pick up to Sunday at 7PM until she shows, 21 after taking parenting classes and enrolling in therapy, that she is capable of caring for Tai for 22 extended periods of time.
Mother opposes this request, stating the parties have followed a 2-2-3 23 parenting time schedule for the last 1.5 years, that despite some issues she has had with Tai, she is 24 fully capable of caring for him, and that the fact that Father thinks she should have Tai for an 25 extended period of time (all weekends) shows he does not think Tai is at risk while in her care. 26 The Court has reviewed and considered all of the parties’ submissions. 27 3) The Court denied Father’s ex parte request pending a hearing on the Court’s regular calendar.
The 28 matter was inadvertently set for 8/6/2026 (the Court’s Tuesday/Thursday law and motion 29
1 calendar) instead of the Monday readiness calendar, so the parties have not attended orientation 2 and mandatory mediation. 3 B. Findings and Orders 4 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child
5 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 6 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 7 child is the United States. 8 2) The parties are ordered to attend orientation and mandatory mediation with Family Court 9 Services (FCS). 10 3) Orientation: On any Monday in August (8/10, 8/17 or 8/24), the parties shall attend orientation 11 via Zoom video from 10:45AM to 12PM by texting their name and email address to FCS at 12 (415) 238-3623 before 10AM on the Monday they choose to attend orientation. The parties are
13 not required to attend orientation on the same Monday. Orientation is designed to provide 14 information to the parties on how to work together towards reaching an agreement regarding 15 custody and parenting time. 16 4) Mediation: The parties shall attend mediation via Zoom video with FCS mediator Jeysa Martinez 17 on 9/15/2026 at 1:30PM. If that date/time does not work for the parties, they shall call FCS 18 immediately (on or before 8/7/2026) at (415) 238-3623 to reschedule the mediation. 19 5) The matter is continued to 10/6/2026 at 9AM in Department 404. At least 10 days before the 20 10/6/2026 hearing, the parties may file brief update declarations informing the Court of any new
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
21 developments and any modifications to their custody and parenting time-related requests. 22 6) Pending the 10/6/2026 hearing, the Court finds it is in Tai’s best interest for the parties to 23 temporarily share joint legal and physical custody of Tai on a 2-2-3 parenting time schedule. The 24 parties may agree, in writing, to a different schedule at any time, including before and after 25 mediation. 26 7) Father’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 27 8) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 28 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 29 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule
1 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 2 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 3 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 4 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d).
8
12
16
20
24
28
29