DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615306·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

JASON VISCARRA VS. ELLEN POON ET AL

Request For Sanctions As Against Plaintiff'S Counsel And Plaintiff In The Amount Of $1,800.00, And/Or An Order To Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed

Hearing date
Mar 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,800.00

Parties

PlaintiffJASON VISCARRA
DefendantELLEN POON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615306 - March 18, 2026 Hearing date: March 18, 2026 Case number: CGC24615306 Case title: JASON VISCARRA VS. ELLEN POON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615306 | Case Title: | | JASON VISCARRA VS. ELLEN POON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Request For Sanctions As Against Plaintiff'S Counsel And Plaintiff In The Amount Of $1,800.00, And/Or An Order To Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 18, 2026. Line 2.1.

DEFENDANT ELLEN POON Request For Sanctions As Against Plaintiff'S Counsel And Plaintiff In The Amount Of $1,800.00, And/Or An Order To Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed is continued to April 17, 2026 to be heard with other pending motion(s). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share