Defendant’s motion to compel discovery
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210
DATE: August 6, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)
**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**
9:00 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV452830 Elie Hernandez Click LINE 1 or scroll down for ruling. v. Pacific Underground Construction, Inc. et al. Line 2 25CV456985 Katelyn Lanini Plaintiff’s motion to deem admitted requests for admission, set two, against v. Heidi Britt et defendant American Tree Medics Inc. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.) al. Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. Defendant made no response to the requests for admission. On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED and the requests for admission are deemed admitted.
The court finds sanctions appropriate in the amount of $555 ($60 filing fee plus one hour at $495/hour). Plaintiff to submit proposed order listing verbatim the admissions to be admitted. Line 3 25CV470556 Wells Fargo Click LINE 3 or scroll down for ruling. Bank, N.A. v. Norberto Carlos, an individual Line 4 25CV472404 Theerapong Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. Plaintiff dismissed the entire Surinsuk v. action before the hearing on the motion. The matter is OFF CALENDAR. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., a corporation et al.
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210
DATE: August 6, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**
Line 5 25CV472404 Theerapong Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. Plaintiff dismissed the entire Surinsuk v. action before the hearing on the motion. The matter is OFF CALENDAR. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., a corporation et al. Line 6 25CV472404 Theerapong Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. Plaintiff dismissed the entire Surinsuk v. action before the hearing on the motion. The matter is OFF CALENDAR. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., a corporation et al. Line 7 25CV479081 Meenakshi Patil Click LINE 7 or scroll down for ruling. v. Amaresh Malipatil et al. Line 8 25CV480254 Services, Click LINE 8 or scroll down for ruling. Immigrant Rights & Education Network et al. v. Paul Joseph et al.
- oo0oo - 9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 25CV480254 Services, Immigrant Application of Jonathan I. Kravis to appear pro hac vice for defendant Rights & Education City of San Jose. No objection filed. Good cause appearing, the Network et al. v. application is GRANTED. Moving party to submit proposed order. Paul Joseph et al. - oo0oo -
3