Request for Order for custody/support modification
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 August 6, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
17. SYDNEY LEOS V. LAWRENCE PORCHIA PFL20210592
Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on May 20, 2026, seeking modification of the current child custody and parenting plan orders, as well as child support order. Petitioner concurrently filed an Income and Expense Declaration. The parties were not referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) as they last attended on April 17, 2026 and reached a stipulation which the court adopted as its order on April 21, 2026. There is no Proof of Service showing Respondent was properly served.
Respondent filed an Income and Expense Declaration on July 23, 2026. There is no Proof of Service for this document, therefore, it has not been considered.
Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration on July 24, 2026. There is no Proof of Service for this document, therefore, it has not been considered.
The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service.
TENTATIVE RULING #17: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”