STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION
Estate of Charles Richard Kepner 25PR000144
STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION
TENTATIVE RULING: On August 3, 2026, Administrators filed a Status Report and set the matter for hearing on August 21, 2026. The instant hearing is, therefore, MOOT.
Estate of Connie Ann Alric 25PR000148
STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION
TENTATIVE RULING: In light of the August 11, 2026 hearing on the Petition for Final Distribution filed June 25, 2026, the present status hearing is VACATED as moot.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. v. Wine Specialty Services LLC 23CV001063
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 19, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B to allow Plaintiff to address the following issue.
The Memorandum and Declaration of Long K. Bui (“Bui Decl.”) show the requested judgment as $332,915.17, made up of $236,277.73 principal, $531.40 court costs, and $96,106.96 interest. (Mem., 5:12; Bui Decl., ¶ 6.) These amounts are consistent with the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment, less the total amount paid by Defendant; however, the Stipulation shows that the parties also agreed to an amount of $1,200 in attorney fees. (See Bui Decl., Exh. A.) With the attorney fees, the total judgment would be $334,116.09. Plaintiff does expressly disclaim, much less address, the attorney fees category. Thus, the Court is concerned that its omission was in error.
If an error, Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Memorandum and Declaration correcting that error. If not an error, Plaintiff is directed to file a Supplemental Declaration to explain/confirm the discrepancy. Plaintiff’s further briefing shall be filed and served by August 12, 2026.
Reed Woodson v. City of St. Helena et al 26CV000379
PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PEREMPTORY WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”