JUAN CARLOS ARANA VS. SUN & GARDEN, INC., DBA SON & GARDEN BY FARMHOUSE ET AL

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24618722 - March 16, 2026 Hearing date: March 16, 2026 Case number: CGC24618722 Case title: JUAN CARLOS ARANA VS. SUN & GARDEN, INC., DBA SON & GARDEN BY FARMHOUSE ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24618722 | Case Title: | | JUAN CARLOS ARANA VS. SUN & GARDEN, INC., DBA SON & GARDEN BY FARMHOUSE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-16 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANT SUN & GARDEN, INC., DBA SON & GARDEN BY FARMHOUSE KITCHEN NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S WAGE AND HOUR CLAIMS BASED ON PLAINTIFF'S INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE (ADDED TO CALENDAR FOR TENTATIVE RULING ENTRY PURPOSES ONLY) | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for Monday, March 16, 2026, Line 9, DEFENDANT SUN & GARDEN, INC., DBA SON & GARDEN BY FARMHOUSE KITCHEN NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S WAGE AND HOUR CLAIMS BASED ON PLAINTIFF'S INVOCATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE (ADDED TO CALENDAR FOR TENTATIVE RULING ENTRY PURPOSES ONLY) (Part 3 of 3).

Even if this court were to decide the issue of remedies, the record is not sufficiently developed to grant the requested sanctions. For example, Defendant seeks an order that Plaintiff in fact used multiple social security numbers. Generally, the remedy is not an irrebuttable determination that the invoking party committed the crime, plus it's unclear how such a finding would play out at trial (which is why it's best to defer to the trial judge). Similarly, Defendant contends that the use of multiple social security numbers prevented it from tracking Plaintiff's hours accurately.

There is no evidence regarding that issue and it's unclear the impact such a finding would have at trial. The trial judge would be in the best position to determine what inferences are drawn from the invocation of the privilege based on their understanding of the case overall and the impact of the invocation(s) on the case and the issues presented.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/JMQ) | |